For LP research analysts
VC Deal Flow Signal for LP Research
Evaluate GP sourcing claims with portfolio-level engineering metrics.
LPs increasingly want to evaluate GP sourcing as a structured discipline rather than a black box. Engineering acceleration as a measurable, repeatable input gives LPs a way to differentiate GPs whose sourcing methodology is rigorous from those who are over-relying on existing networks. The metric is not just for sourcing; it is for evaluating sourcing.
Portfolio retrospective coverage
Most public-GitHub portfolios
GP comparisons
Cross-fund analysis supported
Time per GP analysis
2-4 hours
Problem
Most LP due diligence on GPs focuses on track record, team, and stated methodology. There is no good external way to evaluate whether a GP's sourcing actually produces an edge versus picking up deals everyone else also saw. Aggregate engineering metrics across a GP's portfolio give a quantitative view of whether the GP backed teams during the acceleration window or after consensus formed.
How VC Deal Flow Signal fits
VC Deal Flow Signal lets LPs analyze GPs' portfolio companies retrospectively. Look at when each portfolio company first showed engineering acceleration, when the GP invested, and how that timing compares to peer GPs. The pattern of investing during acceleration windows versus after public events distinguishes GPs sourcing on quantitative leading indicators from GPs sourcing on press cycles.
Workflow
- 1
Pull each portfolio company's acceleration history
For each portfolio company in the GP's record, look up the engineering acceleration time series. Note the first sustained acceleration date.
- 2
Compare investment date to acceleration date
GPs investing during the acceleration window (3 to 6 weeks before public fundraise) demonstrate proactive sourcing. GPs investing after public events demonstrate reactive sourcing.
- 3
Build a GP sourcing-edge metric
Aggregate the lead-time-to-investment across the GP's portfolio. The distribution itself, median, top quartile, tail, is a defensible quantitative read on sourcing methodology.
- 4
Compare against peer GPs
The same metric can be computed for peer GPs in the same vintage. Cross-fund comparison provides relative ranking that is independent of self-reported methodology.
- 5
Inform allocation decisions
The structured metric is one input alongside track record, team, and references. It is not the only input but it adds quantitative rigor to a historically qualitative evaluation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is engineering acceleration a complete measure of sourcing edge?▾
No, sourcing edge has many components, including network strength, founder relationships, and contrarian conviction. Engineering acceleration measures one specific dimension: the timing of investment relative to publicly observable engineering signals. It is one input, not a full evaluation.
Does this work for non-technical sectors?▾
Less well. The framework is most informative for technical sectors where startups have meaningful public engineering footprints. For consumer, services, or hardware-heavy companies, alternative metrics are more relevant.
Can GPs see this analysis?▾
The underlying data is public, so the analysis is independently reproducible by the GP. Most GPs welcome quantitative discussion of their sourcing methodology, it differentiates them from peers when the methodology is genuinely rigorous.
Relevant comparisons
See the signals in action
When you have a live name on your desk
The free email is the watchlist. This is the answer on one company.
The Monday email tells you who’s moving across the market. When a specific company lands on your desk and you need a read before the call, you don’t want to wait for Monday. Two ways to go deeper - still no code to read, still plain-English answers you can paste into a memo.
First Look · €7 once
Test it on your own thesis this week
Point it at one company you’re actually looking at. A single written read on whether the team is genuinely accelerating, for less than the coffee on a partner call.
Dashboard · €49/mo
Keep the panel open for every name you touch
Pull any company, see how its pace stacks up against its peers, and back your memo with a number instead of a hunch. The whole diligence pass in the time it used to take to schedule one.